Freeholder won't give retrospective consent

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jeffrey
    replied
    Originally posted by Poppy View Post
    Has your freeholder showed any sign of making you revert to the original condition? If not, there might not be a problem.

    It is my understanding that the person who will be the insured (if that's the way things progress) is the prospective buyer, not you. You're selling and that will be the end of your responsibility.

    At the end of the day, it is up to your prospective buyer to decide whether they want to take on the risk that at some point in the future the freeholder may try to make them reinstate the flat to its original condition. The ball is back in the prospective buyer's court.

    At this point, there is not much else that you can do.
    There are a few other techniques to unblock the problem.
    If anyone needs to know - I have already explained to Jason - refer to Limitation Act 1980(12 yr rule for one-off breach) and s.45(2) of Law of Property Act 1925 (clear ground rent receipt).

    Leave a comment:


  • Poppy
    replied
    Has your freeholder showed any sign of making you revert to the original condition? If not, there might not be a problem.

    It is my understanding that the person who will be the insured (if that's the way things progress) is the prospective buyer, not you. You're selling and that will be the end of your responsibility.

    At the end of the day, it is up to your prospective buyer to decide whether they want to take on the risk that at some point in the future the freeholder may try to make them reinstate the flat to its original condition. The ball is back in the prospective buyer's court.

    At this point, there is not much else that you can do.

    Leave a comment:


  • jeffrey
    replied
    Originally posted by jasoneden View Post
    Hi,
    I was wondering whether I could get some advice on the following subject please?

    I bought a leasehold flat eight years ago. At the time I just got a basic valuation done and no survey. When I purchased the flat, it had a set of french doors already built in the main bedroom. I am now selling my flat and the buyers' surveyor noticed that the french doors aren't original and asked for proof of the freeholder's agreement, which I didn't have.

    My freeholder, who has never seen my flat and charges me £25 ground rent every six months, has said that he won't agree to the french doors.

    My solicitor said that I needed to get indemnity insurance and my freeholder's signed agreement allowing the french doors. My original solicitor who I used 8 years ago said that all I needed was to get indemnity insurance for about £40 and that would have covered the situation. My current solicitor has disagreed, after trying to tell me that they didn't advise me to tell my freeholder and get indemnity insurance. They have since admitted that they told me to do both, but their reason was that as I can contact my freeholder I wouldn't have been able to get the insurance anyway!

    Could you give me any advice please, as I feel it isn't fair that something that happened before I bought the flat can risk my sale and cost me thousands of pounds!

    Thanks,
    I agree that asking for L's consent scuppers getting indemnity insurance.

    How long ago were french doors installed? Depending on covenant wording, enough time elapsing (>12 yrs) may protect you from L, as might clear ground rent receipt.

    If you like, send private message with your tel. no. and I'll call you tomorrow a.m.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Established use right outside demised lease? Help
    Bengt Lagander
    We are looking at a 2 floor freehold with a garden at back of house ground floor which has a long lease on 1st floor. The title plan of long lease clearly shows the demise is at 1st floor only. There is access to the 1st floor from the front.

    However in reality there is a wooden external...
    19-10-2019, 09:35 AM
  • Reply to Established use right outside demised lease? Help
    Lawcruncher
    Whilst the title may may show that the garden is not included in the demise of the first floor, you need to look at the lease to see if any rights are granted over the garden. Such rights could be:

    · An exclusive right to use the garden
    · A right to share use of the garden
    ...
    19-10-2019, 17:04 PM
  • Reply to Established use right outside demised lease? Help
    pilman
    Unless there is an easement referred to within the Lease then constant use of a right of way by a tenant cannot become legal when there is a common landlord of the two properties.

    Someone will need to read through the whole of the lease to find out whether the current situation is lawful...
    19-10-2019, 16:35 PM
  • Fence on either side who own's which
    ash72
    Is there a golden rule, if the deeds to not specify, who owns and maintains the right or left hand side of the fencing? It's a mid terrace house, I always under the impression that the right hand side of the property was your's to maintain. I tried to look on an aerial view and there's five houses in...
    15-10-2019, 14:55 PM
  • Reply to Fence on either side who own's which
    pilman
    It may not seem right, but one end of a terrace will always have responsibility for the end fence or even both fences, unless the side fences erected to separate properties are shown to be party fences in a conveyance. Some of the older paper deeds did use an inward facing "T" to identify...
    17-10-2019, 12:39 PM
  • Boundary dispute
    Pilavas719
    Hello All,

    Thanks for setting this forum up.
    I have been going through a boundary dispute since I moved into our current property a little background below:

    We moved in on the 12th of July 2016 and the following day my next door neighbor tried to moved the fence 12...
    14-10-2019, 14:06 PM
  • Reply to Boundary dispute
    Pilavas719
    Thanks Lawcrancher, I have visited Jon Maynard's website I even had the pleasure of booking an hour consultation with him, he completely agreed that my neighbour was in the wrong. I have probably read everything online about boundary disputes already. I have come across this forum today and thought...
    14-10-2019, 16:04 PM
  • Reply to Boundary dispute
    Lawcruncher
    The following statements are usually true:

    · If a house owner wants to build an extension and it would be handy if the neighbour's fence was in the wrong place and could be moved towards the neighbour, the fence is in the right place and the boundary follows the fence.

    ·
    ...
    14-10-2019, 15:56 PM
  • Reply to Boundary dispute
    Pilavas719
    A line drawn at the 50% mark on the title plan with no measurements has an accuracy of a meter, Since the title plan holds no ground to demarcate the boundary line render's it useless in my case. we are disputing 3.6 meter of land between our properties where I have 2.2m and my neighbour has 1.4m. ...
    14-10-2019, 15:54 PM
  • Reply to Boundary dispute
    AndrewDod
    Did the neighbour object to the trespass of by the fence previous to your ownership? How was this dispute resolved? Whilst boundary plans are not definitive, a line drawn at the 50% mark in relation to actual structures is at the 50% mark.

    How do you actually know that the neighbour has...
    14-10-2019, 15:44 PM
Working...
X