Can one REMOVE an easement by Prescription?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Can one REMOVE an easement by Prescription?

    I rented a flat in a house in 1980 and was told by the Landlord that, I could park my car on a piece of land at the rear, I subsequently parked my car on this land from 1980 when I rented the house, until I subsequently purchased the house in 1986, I have continued using the land to date,

    However, this land turned out to be unregistered, I complained to my conveyance Solicitor that the land was not included in my Title Deeds whereby, he suggested that I apply to land registry for adverse possessory title, this I did, but land registry refused, subsequently, when my house was sold in 1993 the new owners were claiming access over the unregistered land by easement by prescription.

    Prior to my house being sold in 1993, I enclosed the land on all sides, I erected a wall between the unregistered land and the land belonging to the house under its Title Deeds border, I had gates that were secured with a padlock and chain, however, "somebody" knocked down my wall and stole my chain/padlocks and enclosure gates in 1996.

    The fact that I had enclosed the land until 1996 and continued to use the land to date (2009), I believe, defeats the new owners claim of access by easement by prescription under the 20 year uninterrupted access rule,

    The new owners sold the house to Developers in 2009, the Developers have built a house on the land belonging to the house that they purchased within its Title Deeds, and the only access to this new build house, is across the unregistered land which I had enclosed.

    I recently took out an injunction in the County Court in order to prevent the Developers from accessing the unregistered land, however, the Judge ruled that the land enjoys a “continuing right” of access because previous owners to my purchase of the house had used the unregistered land as access.

    Have I the right to appeal/dispute the Judge's decision, as I did enclose the land which I believe defeats the Developers claim to access over the land under Easement Law?.

    #2
    Are you confusing/conflating:
    a. the Limitation Act 1980 and acquisition of land by adverse possession; and
    b. the Prescription Act 1832 and acquisition of prescriptive easements?
    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

    Comment


      #3
      easement under the prescriptions act 1832.

      Thank you Jeffrey for your reply and interest,

      The Developers are claiming access over the unregistered land by easement under the prescriptions act 1832.

      There is a new development in this case, I have today spoken to land registry and they have told me, and are sending proof to me, that, the unregistered land was, in 1954, attached to an adjoining property (call this property plot 2) therefore, the unregistered land was not attached to the house that I and the developers subsequently purchased, albeit the developers also purchased the property that is proved to have the unregistered land attached to (plot 2), however, they are not claiming access to this property because it has its own separate access.

      Therefore, it seems that, the previous owner who sold the house to me, had “illegally” occupied and accessed over the unregistered land in order to access a garage that they at sometime in the past installed at the rear of their/my house, this factor is why I queried with my conveyance Solicitor after I purchased my house, why was it that, the unregistered land was not on my Title Deeds, now I know why!!.

      In view of the new information from land registry abovementioned, does the claim of access by easement by prescription, by the Developers, now fail? as the original access was illegal,

      Consequently, can the Judge award a continuing access under easement by prescription which was originally illegal?, and, have I a got a case to have judgement set aside, with a new hearing presenting the new evidence which would endorse my application to the Court for an injunction against the Developers access,?

      Or would it be the case that, the Developers still have a “continuing” right of access over the unregistered land because, the previous owners had (illegal) access including myself.?

      Furthermore, where does this leave me with regard to my continued access to the unregistered land, and my claim to land registry of adverse possessory title?

      Regards Billand

      Comment


        #4
        Too complex for here, I regret. You need proper paid-for advice to secure your position.
        JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
        1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
        2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
        3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
        4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

        Comment


          #5
          Thanks Jeffrey,

          The reason that I haven’t employed a Solicitors is the expense that I cannot afford, that is why I have been handling this case on my own,

          However, I am looking for a Solicitor who might want to take on the case on a “win percentage” situation, especially as the Developers house, built at the rear of the unregistered land, is on the market at £870,000.00, and the unregistered land is the only possible access, then the Developers would have to pay a substantial price if I win the case, because the Developers will not be able to sell or let the house!!

          Do you or anybody know of such a Solicitors firm that might want to take on this case?

          Regards

          Billand

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • Who owns the loft space?
            poptwig
            Hi
            I am new to this site. I've looked around for an equivalent scenario to my situation but haven't found one. I hope someone can help and this question isn't repetition...
            I live in a ground floor, purpose-built, maisonette (North London). There is a first floor maisonette above mine....
            15-08-2011, 00:07 AM
          • Reply to Who owns the loft space?
            wfd_property
            Its really a question for a solicitor. I would query whether you have the loft demised to you, though.

            Does the other freeholder have a power of attorney who could consent for him?...
            15-01-2018, 21:53 PM
          • Reply to Who owns the loft space?
            Vassena
            Hi,

            I know this is an old post but I have a very similar question regarding the ownership of the loft space in our flat which is also a Victorian split conversion (with a share of the freehold). We own tthe top floor flat and are the only owners of the roof. The lease of the lower ground...
            15-01-2018, 11:58 AM
          • Easement granted for septic tank drainage
            cfaproperty
            This is one for Jeffrey or Lawcruncher - our neighbours have their septic tank drainage on our land and it is permitted in the deeds that they can maintain, repair and renew as necessary for which we have no challenges. The system is leaking effluent onto our land but beyond the system that is outlined...
            18-05-2013, 13:26 PM
          • Reply to Easement granted for septic tank drainage
            wfd_property
            Seems reasonable that it would so encompass.........
            13-01-2018, 12:22 PM
          • Filling first accounts for company
            pred02
            Hi,

            My neighbor and I purchased the freehold for a split flat maisonette. We formed a company to own a share of freehold and need to file out first accounts. As it is two of us we do not use the company for trade, we do not pay ground rent or have a management company. Can we just classify...
            06-01-2018, 14:48 PM
          • Reply to Filling first accounts for company
            wfd_property
            You don't want a mistake here. The company has (presumably) two shareholders and a rather big asset.

            Depending how you use it (are you proposing to open a bank account and pay in to a sinking fund each year?) the accounts need to be prepared properly, albeit that there may be only three...
            13-01-2018, 12:19 PM
          • Reply to Easement granted for septic tank drainage
            The buggles
            Hi .. does anyone know if an easement for emptying and repair of septic tank also encompasses replacement?
            thanks
            10-01-2018, 15:48 PM
          • Reply to Filling first accounts for company
            Gordon999
            Look for a shop offering book-keeping and VAT services and ask if they can help with first year filing returns to Companies House.

            These shops serve small businesses and may be found in parade of shops in outer areas of the town. and will be cheaper than accountant....
            08-01-2018, 14:26 PM
          • Reply to Filling first accounts for company
            pred02
            Ok, it makes sense. Is it difficult for me to file the company accounts or do I need an accountant to do so? I do not have any other transactions logged in the name of the company. I think the building insurance is also purchased in the company name.

            Thank you...
            07-01-2018, 14:25 PM
          Working...
          X