Freehold transfer % question

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Freehold transfer % question

    I own one of 3 apartments in a building. the freehold of the property is owned / shared by the 3 apartment owners. One owner is selling his apartment and I have been asked by his conveyancer to sign the TR1 form to update the list of the freeholders. I noticed the buyer will have 2 names (presumably husband and wife) and and the transferees on TR1 is like this:

    myself, 3rd apartment owner, buyer1 and buyer2

    does this mean if the transfer is executed successfully, there will then be 4 freeholders so my share of the freehold will drop from 1/3 to 1/4? section 10 (declaration of trust) of TR1 has been left blank. would it be wise / safer to declare a trust and mention the share % explicitly?

    any help will be appreciated.

    Is the transfer expressed to be made for the purpose of appointing new trustees?


      If you have 3 flats, you only have 3 shares.
      3 flats, 3 votes at meetings.

      You want a level playing field. One flat: One share certificate, one vote per flat.

      You can put 2 names on one share, but only the names that "own" the lease. But still only one vote per share irrespective of the number of names on the share.

      The share for the outgoing owner is returned to you, is cancelled, put in that flats file.
      You write a new share certificate and put the same number on the certificate as the one it replaces ( the cancelled one ).

      Think of it this way;
      Flat one has one share, flat 2 has one share, but if flat 3 has mother, farther and son~( as in my past dealings ) insisting they have 3 shares, you will be out voted EVERY time at meetings, service charges etc.
      You then get flat 3 having 3 votes against the other 2. They will rule the roost, and your problems will be insurmountable.

      3 flats with one share each flat.

      O.K. ?


        Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
        Is the transfer expressed to be made for the purpose of appointing new trustees?
        hmm, I guess the purpose of the transfer is for the apartment together w the freehold. The TR1 form sent to me has both the apartment and the freehold title number (it does look a bit odd to me). the area that concerns me obviously is the appointing of the new freeholder (new trustee?) in the freehold and remove the seller.


          ram This is a tenants in common arrangement, not a limited company.


            I think I need to see the transfer. Can you post it blanking out personal details?



              We never had anything set up so presumably this makes us, the 3 apartment owners tenants in common? So is what you describe above kind of the common understanding? I took a look at the title file of the freehold avail in land registry and there is nothing specificially mentioned on how (%) the freehold is shared. it just says the proprietors are...

              I understand what you are saying though and it makes sense. I just want to be careful and not sign / agree to anything that I shouldnt since I am no expert on this freehold legal stuff.


                Normally, for tenants in common, all the joint owners must agree to any decision about the freehold. If you don't have a trust deed, this will be the case.

                The problem that would interest me is where this happens to a second flat and you exceed the limit of four on registrations.


                  u mean in my case, if I sign and executed, then there will be 4 owners on the freehold?

                  your 2nd question did cross my mind also. or if I pass it on to 2 people in my will or something. Do you think the way the transferee list is written 'buyer name 1 AND name 2' is considered as one single owner/entity? the other freeholder's names are just separated by comma. as in:

                  me, 3rd free holder, buyer name1 and buyer name2


                    It all depends on what the transfer says. Please see post 6.


                      just pm'd you. It took me a while as the system complained about the file size.


                        Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
                        I think I need to see the transfer. Can you post it blanking out personal details?
                        I made one up based on the TR1 sent to me so anyone can see wo me worry abt forgetting to redact some detail. section 10 and 11 (declaration of trust and additional provisions) were left blank as in the original. any thoughts and advice would be appreciated.

                        Dropbox is a free service that lets you bring your photos, docs, and videos anywhere and share them easily. Never email yourself a file again!


                          I would suggest the third box in section 10 needs to be ticked, and the accompanying trust documents should show the desired proportions of beneficial ownership. If anything other than unanimous decisions are required, it should also provide details of voting rules.


                            yeah, I know that will make the most sense. at the same time, I am trying to be mr nice guy and not introduce new items to hold up the neighbours sale. I guess if it has to be done, it has to be done.


                              You could also suggest that only one of the buyers becomes party to the freehold.


                              Latest Activity


                              • retrospective notice of assignment
                                bit of an oddity, my freeholder has come back (this was brought to light by change of bank account by new owner) that they don't have a notice of assignement... for a transaction back in 2012. Me (my flat) to the new owner.

                                Everything else is in place and I am on good terms with...
                                04-06-2019, 10:48 AM
                              • Reply to retrospective notice of assignment
                                a rather late reply but its taken this long to get over the line.
                                I checked others leases obtained from Land Registry and they were all the same, notice only specified in writing, nothing else.
                                In between they wrote asking again for the notice to be sent (via solicitor) or would...
                                23-08-2019, 13:46 PM
                              • Remortgaging to a BTL so much to pay!
                                My wife and I are in the process of remortgaging our home to a BTL and buying a new home.

                                I've been in discussions with a mortgage advisor for the last couple of weeks. The purchase mortgage is straight forward but the BTL mortgage is proving a bit more difficult to decide upon. We...
                                21-08-2019, 00:59 AM
                              • Reply to Remortgaging to a BTL so much to pay!
                                What is the research provided by your broker in focusing on BM Solutions , they are no longer a lender who is the automatic 1st choice

                                Ask your broker why he didn't quote the following:-
                                Santander 1.39% 27 months fixed including Free Legals
                                Barclays 1.41% 27 months fixed including...
                                21-08-2019, 16:27 PM
                              • Reply to Remortgaging to a BTL so much to pay!
                                Thank JP, yeah i was thinking we should fix for longer but if landlording doesn't work out we will have to pay big early repayment charges if we sell.

                                The lender our broker has recommended (BM Solutions) pays £300 casback on legal fees. Our solicitor is quoting almost a grand so thats...
                                21-08-2019, 08:14 AM
                              • Reply to Remortgaging to a BTL so much to pay!
                                Most BTL mortgage lenders will use their own solicitor for conveyancing at no (direct) cost to the lender).
                                You usually can add the product fee to the amount borrowed - on the basis that you hope the property value increases by at least that.

                                While I appreciate that landlording may...
                                21-08-2019, 07:48 AM
                              • Address wrong on Land Registry Title. A little rant. and request for empathy.
                                We are buying a property built in 1847, with some interesting history, and are somewhat frustrated by the both our own solicitor and the vendor and their solicitor.

                                Since having our offer accepted, on a house with no chain, either end, it has been 16 weeks, but the last 4 weeks have been...
                                06-08-2019, 18:50 PM
                              • Reply to Address wrong on Land Registry Title. A little rant. and request for empathy.
                                So eventually I phoned the Estate agent and explain that I'm now being told by our solicitor that the vendors solicitor had put in this application, but I'd like proof, if that were possible.
                                30 mins later she sent an email, which had an email.from.their solicitor saying it had been done on the...
                                20-08-2019, 09:50 AM
                              • Solicitors Negligence Question
                                Freddie thumb
                                I'm read these forums for a little while and just signed up to ask a quick question. I'm not sure if this is 8n 5he right place.

                                So I bought a property in 2008 and discovered that the Title to my property was defective in 2015. Basically there was a piece of land on the title of my property...
                                12-08-2019, 08:40 AM
                              • Reply to Solicitors Negligence Question
                                Are you saying that the Land Registry plan does not match the apparent boundaries of the land you occupy? If so, is the problem that you occupy land not shown as yours on the plan or that a neighbour occupies land shown as yours on the plan?
                                16-08-2019, 09:46 AM