Absent freehold beneficiaries?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Absent freehold beneficiaries?

    Hi guys, new poster here so forgive me if I get my terms mixed up!

    I have just made an offer on a ground floor flat in a block of 3. A,B and C. Sold as Share of Freehold, no company. We'll call this flat A.

    The owner of flat B died in 2015. The "residue" of her estate including flat B was left to 17 different charities in equal shares. According to the appointed solicitors this was wrapped up in 2017.

    As of today the flat is empty, leaking and obviously not paying anything towards the (minimal) upkeep of the block.

    Am I correct in thinking it's likely the Freehold is now owned by the owners of flats A + C? with the charities maintaining some sort of beneficial interest?

    In practise is this going to be a problem?

    The title still lists the deceased so it appears that none of the charities have taken the lead in regards to taking ownership, selling the property and distributing funds. As I understand a trust would need to be set up. Is this correct? Is there any way to find out if this has been done already?

    Thanks in advance


    Sounds like the executors have made a mess of this.

    I would have thought the share of the freehold and the share of the lease are still held in trust by the executors.


      Yes agree with leaseholder, still held by the executors pending an agreement by all beneficiaries to sell and monies distributed equally. Getting 17 organisations to agree is going to take a while . . .



        Is there any way to find out if this is the case (held in trust by the nephews)?

        Assuming this is the case I can't imagine they are particularly incentivised to get this sorted, they had their part of the inheritance 2 years ago.


          If the Land Registry has not updated, it will be held in trust by the executors. The combination of the will and the Land Registry entry should be all that is necessary.

          Note, that they should be paying the ground rent and service charges. Once they have probate, they no longer have any excuse for not doing so.


          Latest Activity


          • Fence on either side who own's which
            Is there a golden rule, if the deeds to not specify, who owns and maintains the right or left hand side of the fencing? It's a mid terrace house, I always under the impression that the right hand side of the property was your's to maintain. I tried to look on an aerial view and there's five houses in...
            15-10-2019, 14:55 PM
          • Reply to Fence on either side who own's which
            It may not seem right, but one end of a terrace will always have responsibility for the end fence or even both fences, unless the side fences erected to separate properties are shown to be party fences in a conveyance. Some of the older paper deeds did use an inward facing "T" to identify...
            17-10-2019, 12:39 PM
          • Boundary dispute
            Hello All,

            Thanks for setting this forum up.
            I have been going through a boundary dispute since I moved into our current property a little background below:

            We moved in on the 12th of July 2016 and the following day my next door neighbor tried to moved the fence 12...
            14-10-2019, 14:06 PM
          • Reply to Boundary dispute
            Thanks Lawcrancher, I have visited Jon Maynard's website I even had the pleasure of booking an hour consultation with him, he completely agreed that my neighbour was in the wrong. I have probably read everything online about boundary disputes already. I have come across this forum today and thought...
            14-10-2019, 16:04 PM
          • Reply to Boundary dispute
            The following statements are usually true:

            · If a house owner wants to build an extension and it would be handy if the neighbour's fence was in the wrong place and could be moved towards the neighbour, the fence is in the right place and the boundary follows the fence.

            14-10-2019, 15:56 PM
          • Reply to Boundary dispute
            A line drawn at the 50% mark on the title plan with no measurements has an accuracy of a meter, Since the title plan holds no ground to demarcate the boundary line render's it useless in my case. we are disputing 3.6 meter of land between our properties where I have 2.2m and my neighbour has 1.4m. ...
            14-10-2019, 15:54 PM
          • Reply to Boundary dispute
            Did the neighbour object to the trespass of by the fence previous to your ownership? How was this dispute resolved? Whilst boundary plans are not definitive, a line drawn at the 50% mark in relation to actual structures is at the 50% mark.

            How do you actually know that the neighbour has...
            14-10-2019, 15:44 PM
          • Reply to Boundary dispute
            You might want to craftily find out when your neighbour moved in. If the fence was in its present position then, I can't see he has a leg to stand on.
            14-10-2019, 15:29 PM
          • Reply to Boundary dispute
            I thought you can't base the position of a boundary on a title plan given the general boundary rule. Surely If this is what the LR practice you can't just move a boundary based on plans alone. If what you're saying is right I can still make an adverse possession claim and claim the land with proof that...
            14-10-2019, 15:15 PM
          • Reply to Boundary dispute
            Thanks JK0, The previous owner has given me a sworn statement to support this. I know the surveyor we will appoint will be RICS and follow certain protocols....
            14-10-2019, 15:05 PM