Complain to Solicitor about Private Road?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Complain to Solicitor about Private Road?

    We purchased our property - number 7 of an estate of 7 new build houses two years ago. A year ago, going through the title plans of the purchase agreement, we noticed that the plan did not show our back garden as it is in reality. There was a large chunk missing.

    After threatening our solicitor to go to the Ombudsman, the solicitor arranged for a transfer deed from the Developer of this estate to ours. I have attached a title plan to show our back garden, which is a separate chunk of land. We have finally obtained it.

    Moving forward to today - The estate benefits from a private road. The solicitor had also told us that this private road was 'jointly' owned by all 7 houses, and its maintenance and repair was our responsibility. We were similarly liable for any accidents occurring due to it. Hence, we took out home insurance that covered us for private road.

    The Developer, who is a very dishonest man, had retained the back of our garden originally to create access to the house on our left - number 6. Although this matter is now resolved (as above), he has now obtained planning and begun to develop a garden where the visitors parking is marked, and a private drive on half of the private road (drawn out on the picture) for a new house he is building to our east. This particular piece of private road was being used as a turning circle. However, as he has opened up the fences and is building a road next to it, this turning circle is redundant.

    We had originally intended to approach the owners of the remainder of 6 houses of the Estate, asking if everybody was happy to de-designate this as a turning circle as it is a nuisance to us, and transfer this piece of land to us for an agreed sum.

    Having seen the developer start building on it, when he had sold this to us as visitors parking and private road, we are thoroughly confused as to what has happened.

    Did our solicitor not advise us correctly? Do we not own 1/7th of this land, and therefore have been paying to maintain it?

    I downloaded the title plans for 'land on the east of number 7' as this is the strip in question, and it shows a third party as the owner - neither the Estate, nor the Developer.

    And to make matters worse, our front drive is also not fully shown as ours, but this was correctly drawn out with frontage and sold to us in the plans A and B as part of the purchase agreement (also attached). Why is this discrepancy between two title plans?

    I can attach the wordings of the plans here, as I simply do not understand what it really means. There are some 6 pages talking about this road and the visitor parking.

    Essentially, what I am trying to understand is:

    1. Should we complain to our solicitor due to the discrepancy in the plans?
    2. Do we, or do we not own the private road and visitors parking in conjunction with the rest of the Estate?
    3. Can the developer build another property on it?
    4. Is it possible to have this strip of land purchased from the remainder of the Estate and transferred to us?

    Thank you very much.
    Title plan for land to east of number 7 has our front drive missing, and private road and visitor parking also not designated. Plan A shows correct frontage, and front drive as we understood we owned, and private road as we had understood we owned jointly with the Estate

    #2
    Can anybody help?

    Comment


      #3
      I suggest you check with Land Registry Records for
      ( 1) your freehold house no. 7 and the site plan for showing the position of boundary line matches the boundary fencing you have on site .

      ( 2) the site plan for your private road owned by the 7 houses is registered correctly. . .

      Comment

      Latest Activity

      Collapse

      • Established use right outside demised lease? Help
        Bengt Lagander
        We are looking at a 2 floor freehold with a garden at back of house ground floor which has a long lease on 1st floor. The title plan of long lease clearly shows the demise is at 1st floor only. There is access to the 1st floor from the front.

        However in reality there is a wooden external...
        19-10-2019, 09:35 AM
      • Reply to Established use right outside demised lease? Help
        Lawcruncher
        Whilst the title may may show that the garden is not included in the demise of the first floor, you need to look at the lease to see if any rights are granted over the garden. Such rights could be:

        · An exclusive right to use the garden
        · A right to share use of the garden
        ...
        19-10-2019, 17:04 PM
      • Reply to Established use right outside demised lease? Help
        pilman
        Unless there is an easement referred to within the Lease then constant use of a right of way by a tenant cannot become legal when there is a common landlord of the two properties.

        Someone will need to read through the whole of the lease to find out whether the current situation is lawful...
        19-10-2019, 16:35 PM
      • Fence on either side who own's which
        ash72
        Is there a golden rule, if the deeds to not specify, who owns and maintains the right or left hand side of the fencing? It's a mid terrace house, I always under the impression that the right hand side of the property was your's to maintain. I tried to look on an aerial view and there's five houses in...
        15-10-2019, 14:55 PM
      • Reply to Fence on either side who own's which
        pilman
        It may not seem right, but one end of a terrace will always have responsibility for the end fence or even both fences, unless the side fences erected to separate properties are shown to be party fences in a conveyance. Some of the older paper deeds did use an inward facing "T" to identify...
        17-10-2019, 12:39 PM
      • Boundary dispute
        Pilavas719
        Hello All,

        Thanks for setting this forum up.
        I have been going through a boundary dispute since I moved into our current property a little background below:

        We moved in on the 12th of July 2016 and the following day my next door neighbor tried to moved the fence 12...
        14-10-2019, 14:06 PM
      • Reply to Boundary dispute
        Pilavas719
        Thanks Lawcrancher, I have visited Jon Maynard's website I even had the pleasure of booking an hour consultation with him, he completely agreed that my neighbour was in the wrong. I have probably read everything online about boundary disputes already. I have come across this forum today and thought...
        14-10-2019, 16:04 PM
      • Reply to Boundary dispute
        Lawcruncher
        The following statements are usually true:

        · If a house owner wants to build an extension and it would be handy if the neighbour's fence was in the wrong place and could be moved towards the neighbour, the fence is in the right place and the boundary follows the fence.

        ·
        ...
        14-10-2019, 15:56 PM
      • Reply to Boundary dispute
        Pilavas719
        A line drawn at the 50% mark on the title plan with no measurements has an accuracy of a meter, Since the title plan holds no ground to demarcate the boundary line render's it useless in my case. we are disputing 3.6 meter of land between our properties where I have 2.2m and my neighbour has 1.4m. ...
        14-10-2019, 15:54 PM
      • Reply to Boundary dispute
        AndrewDod
        Did the neighbour object to the trespass of by the fence previous to your ownership? How was this dispute resolved? Whilst boundary plans are not definitive, a line drawn at the 50% mark in relation to actual structures is at the 50% mark.

        How do you actually know that the neighbour has...
        14-10-2019, 15:44 PM
      Working...
      X