Complain to Solicitor about Private Road?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Complain to Solicitor about Private Road?

    We purchased our property - number 7 of an estate of 7 new build houses two years ago. A year ago, going through the title plans of the purchase agreement, we noticed that the plan did not show our back garden as it is in reality. There was a large chunk missing.

    After threatening our solicitor to go to the Ombudsman, the solicitor arranged for a transfer deed from the Developer of this estate to ours. I have attached a title plan to show our back garden, which is a separate chunk of land. We have finally obtained it.

    Moving forward to today - The estate benefits from a private road. The solicitor had also told us that this private road was 'jointly' owned by all 7 houses, and its maintenance and repair was our responsibility. We were similarly liable for any accidents occurring due to it. Hence, we took out home insurance that covered us for private road.

    The Developer, who is a very dishonest man, had retained the back of our garden originally to create access to the house on our left - number 6. Although this matter is now resolved (as above), he has now obtained planning and begun to develop a garden where the visitors parking is marked, and a private drive on half of the private road (drawn out on the picture) for a new house he is building to our east. This particular piece of private road was being used as a turning circle. However, as he has opened up the fences and is building a road next to it, this turning circle is redundant.

    We had originally intended to approach the owners of the remainder of 6 houses of the Estate, asking if everybody was happy to de-designate this as a turning circle as it is a nuisance to us, and transfer this piece of land to us for an agreed sum.

    Having seen the developer start building on it, when he had sold this to us as visitors parking and private road, we are thoroughly confused as to what has happened.

    Did our solicitor not advise us correctly? Do we not own 1/7th of this land, and therefore have been paying to maintain it?

    I downloaded the title plans for 'land on the east of number 7' as this is the strip in question, and it shows a third party as the owner - neither the Estate, nor the Developer.

    And to make matters worse, our front drive is also not fully shown as ours, but this was correctly drawn out with frontage and sold to us in the plans A and B as part of the purchase agreement (also attached). Why is this discrepancy between two title plans?

    I can attach the wordings of the plans here, as I simply do not understand what it really means. There are some 6 pages talking about this road and the visitor parking.

    Essentially, what I am trying to understand is:

    1. Should we complain to our solicitor due to the discrepancy in the plans?
    2. Do we, or do we not own the private road and visitors parking in conjunction with the rest of the Estate?
    3. Can the developer build another property on it?
    4. Is it possible to have this strip of land purchased from the remainder of the Estate and transferred to us?

    Thank you very much.
    Title plan for land to east of number 7 has our front drive missing, and private road and visitor parking also not designated. Plan A shows correct frontage, and front drive as we understood we owned, and private road as we had understood we owned jointly with the Estate

    Can anybody help?


      I suggest you check with Land Registry Records for
      ( 1) your freehold house no. 7 and the site plan for showing the position of boundary line matches the boundary fencing you have on site .

      ( 2) the site plan for your private road owned by the 7 houses is registered correctly. . .


      Latest Activity


      • Deed of variation

        I have recently discovered a problem with the leasehold flat I live in. I purchased the flat years ago, 1 flat of a block of 4. I recently went onto Land registry to see my lease and noticed my lease on there is only 99 years, the original deed from 1978. This lease was changed by deed...
        23-05-2019, 17:07 PM
      • Reply to Deed of variation
        Register it at the Land Registry. They'l tell you what to do.
        23-05-2019, 17:36 PM
      • Absent freehold beneficiaries?
        Hi guys, new poster here so forgive me if I get my terms mixed up!

        I have just made an offer on a ground floor flat in a block of 3. A,B and C. Sold as Share of Freehold, no company. We'll call this flat A.

        The owner of flat B died in 2015. The "residue"...
        16-05-2019, 19:45 PM
      • Reply to Absent freehold beneficiaries?
        If the Land Registry has not updated, it will be held in trust by the executors. The combination of the will and the Land Registry entry should be all that is necessary.

        Note, that they should be paying the ground rent and service charges. Once they have probate, they no longer have any...
        17-05-2019, 09:36 AM
      • Reply to Absent freehold beneficiaries?
        Is there any way to find out if this is the case (held in trust by the nephews)?

        Assuming this is the case I can't imagine they are particularly incentivised to get this sorted, they had their part of the inheritance 2 years ago....
        17-05-2019, 08:33 AM
      • Is There a Conflict Of Interest Here?
        mrs. sparkle
        Recently purchased an auction property and the lender I am obtaining bridging finance from requires a solicitor to represent them from their panel.

        What I wanted to know is whether it is okay for the lenders solicitor to also represent me the purchaser?

        Someone mentioned to...
        16-05-2019, 12:47 PM
      • Reply to Is There a Conflict Of Interest Here?
        mrs. sparkle
        Thanks guys
        17-05-2019, 02:46 AM
      • Reply to Absent freehold beneficiaries?
        Yes agree with leaseholder, still held by the executors pending an agreement by all beneficiaries to sell and monies distributed equally. Getting 17 organisations to agree is going to take a while . . .
        16-05-2019, 22:07 PM
      • Reply to Absent freehold beneficiaries?
        Sounds like the executors have made a mess of this.

        I would have thought the share of the freehold and the share of the lease are still held in trust by the executors.
        16-05-2019, 21:51 PM
      • Reply to Is There a Conflict Of Interest Here?
        The main point is that both purchaser and lender want the same thing: a property with a good and marketable title. A conflict of interest only arises if the lawyer finds something he does not like and the purchaser instructs him not to tell the lender. If that happens and the purchaser persists in the...
        16-05-2019, 21:47 PM