Is a small shared house a "single private dwellinghouse" for covenant purposes?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Is a small shared house a "single private dwellinghouse" for covenant purposes?

    I am thinking of buying a house (in England) which I would let as a small shared house to a pre-formed groups friends on a single joint and several AST.

    It is an ex-council house and is subject to the standard restrictive covenant "...not to use the property otherwise than for the purpose of a single private dwellinghouse..." which gets slapped on to all council properties upon their sale via right to buy.

    My understanding from a quick Google is that this would prevent me from letting the property to groups of strangers on a room-by-room basis, but letting to a small group of friends on a single joint and several AST does fall within the definition of a "single private dwellinghouse" in the context of a restrictive covenant (and other contexts in which the term "single private dwellinghouse" might appear, for example in relation to C3/C4 planning use class or the Housing Act 2004, are not necessarily relevant to the interpretation of this covenant). Am I correct?

    (In case it makes any difference, it has been let by the previous owner as a small shared house for at least 10 years without any enforcement taking place, and the council is aware of this as it has issued both an HMO licence under an additional licensing scheme and a Certificate of Existing Lawful Use or Development showing it has C4 use class status).

    #2
    (PS I just realised this is more a conveyancing question than a planning question -- any mods around should feel free to move the thread)

    Comment


      #3
      I think I've found my answer: in Roberts v Howlett [2002] 1 P&CR 19 letting a house to a pre-formed group of four students was held not to be a breach of an identical covenant. This still appears to be the leading case on this question. If I've missed something, however, I'd be keen to hear it.

      Comment

      Latest Activity

      Collapse

      • Deed of variation
        Lizey
        Hi.

        I have recently discovered a problem with the leasehold flat I live in. I purchased the flat years ago, 1 flat of a block of 4. I recently went onto Land registry to see my lease and noticed my lease on there is only 99 years, the original deed from 1978. This lease was changed by deed...
        23-05-2019, 17:07 PM
      • Reply to Deed of variation
        Tipper
        Register it at the Land Registry. They'l tell you what to do.
        23-05-2019, 17:36 PM
      • Absent freehold beneficiaries?
        Mat1
        Hi guys, new poster here so forgive me if I get my terms mixed up!


        I have just made an offer on a ground floor flat in a block of 3. A,B and C. Sold as Share of Freehold, no company. We'll call this flat A.


        The owner of flat B died in 2015. The "residue"...
        16-05-2019, 19:45 PM
      • Reply to Absent freehold beneficiaries?
        leaseholder64
        If the Land Registry has not updated, it will be held in trust by the executors. The combination of the will and the Land Registry entry should be all that is necessary.

        Note, that they should be paying the ground rent and service charges. Once they have probate, they no longer have any...
        17-05-2019, 09:36 AM
      • Reply to Absent freehold beneficiaries?
        Mat1
        Is there any way to find out if this is the case (held in trust by the nephews)?

        Assuming this is the case I can't imagine they are particularly incentivised to get this sorted, they had their part of the inheritance 2 years ago....
        17-05-2019, 08:33 AM
      • Is There a Conflict Of Interest Here?
        mrs. sparkle
        Recently purchased an auction property and the lender I am obtaining bridging finance from requires a solicitor to represent them from their panel.

        What I wanted to know is whether it is okay for the lenders solicitor to also represent me the purchaser?

        Someone mentioned to...
        16-05-2019, 12:47 PM
      • Reply to Is There a Conflict Of Interest Here?
        mrs. sparkle
        Thanks guys
        17-05-2019, 02:46 AM
      • Reply to Absent freehold beneficiaries?
        Jon66
        Yes agree with leaseholder, still held by the executors pending an agreement by all beneficiaries to sell and monies distributed equally. Getting 17 organisations to agree is going to take a while . . .
        16-05-2019, 22:07 PM
      • Reply to Absent freehold beneficiaries?
        leaseholder64
        Sounds like the executors have made a mess of this.

        I would have thought the share of the freehold and the share of the lease are still held in trust by the executors.
        16-05-2019, 21:51 PM
      • Reply to Is There a Conflict Of Interest Here?
        Lawcruncher
        The main point is that both purchaser and lender want the same thing: a property with a good and marketable title. A conflict of interest only arises if the lawyer finds something he does not like and the purchaser instructs him not to tell the lender. If that happens and the purchaser persists in the...
        16-05-2019, 21:47 PM
      Working...
      X