Commercial deposit new landlord

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Commercial deposit new landlord

    My lease ended in December. At last minute landlord sold lease. Requirement in my lease that new landlord must sign new deposit deed, and requirement that i sign the deed. New Deed was never entered into before my lease expired. New landlord trying to hold back my deposit which is significant. Can they force me post expiry to sign a deed when the lease has ended and my obligations under the lease have ended? Should they be holding my despot if deed never entered into. Still getting interest letters from old landlord confirming what amounts are due to me at expiry of lease. Any help appreciated.

  • #2
    2 issues with your statement...

    1) either your lease has continued under the provisions of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 - your obligations remain and you're required to give 3 months notice if you intend to vacate.

    2) If your lease was contracted outside the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 then you're trespassing.

    In any event. Deposit should have been accounted for at completion, lease and deposit deed should make reference to landlord and successors in title. No need necessarily to need a new rent deposit deed. What does the lease specifically state in relation to this requirement for a new rent deposit deed?
    [I]The opinions I give are simply my opinions and interpretations of what I have learnt, in numerous years as a property professional, I would not rely upon them without consulting with a paid advisor and providing them with all the relevant facts[I]

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you for your response. Old landlord had already invoked break clause. Lease ended in dec and I vacated in dec.

      From my perspective lease is at an end.

      Lease says that landlord may transfer the reversion, the rent deposit deed shall also be assignable, and if so assigned "the landlord shall procure they the transferee will covenant at its sole expense with the tenant in the same terms as if the transferee had sealed this deed and the tenant will subject to being indemnified for all costs arising therefrom execute and deliver to the landlord a deed releasing the landlord from any further liability under this deed. The tenant hereby appoints the landlord or delegates to execute the deed mentioned in this clause.

      I have never been notified of this nor have I signed any deed of release. Now that the lease is at an end, where do I stand.

      Original landlord was going to demolish building and did not require any repair or redecoration. 4 weeks before expiry I was informed building had been sold and 10 days before expiry new landlord got in touch thro surveyor. 7 days before expiry surveyor inspected property with purpose of giving me clear indication what needed to be done. he led me to believe that premises were in acceptable condition. Now 6 weeks later I am facing a delapidations schedule of over £8000. Any help appreciated. Am hardworking and had to move my business elsewhere at considerable cost to me.


      Originally posted by MrJohnnyB View Post
      2 issues with your statement...

      1) either your lease has continued under the provisions of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 - your obligations remain and you're required to give 3 months notice if you intend to vacate.

      2) If your lease was contracted outside the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 then you're trespassing.

      In any event. Deposit should have been accounted for at completion, lease and deposit deed should make reference to landlord and successors in title. No need necessarily to need a new rent deposit deed. What does the lease specifically state in relation to this requirement for a new rent deposit deed?

      Comment


      • #4
        Has the new owner of the building submitted plans to redevelop the property?
        [I]The opinions I give are simply my opinions and interpretations of what I have learnt, in numerous years as a property professional, I would not rely upon them without consulting with a paid advisor and providing them with all the relevant facts[I]

        Comment

        Latest Activity

        Collapse

        • Planning permission
          RidingS
          We have recently been contacted to say that a unit does not have planning for workshop use but for office only. We bought the unit(s) and have owned for a number of years and this unit was a workshop then (and not offices). What is the planning rule on this type of thing? All the units that surround...
          06-08-2017, 16:34 PM
        • Reply to Planning permission
          leaseholder64
          The limit is 4 years for unauthorised building work, unless it also violates an existing planning condition, in which case it is 10 years.

          It is 10 years for unauthorised change of use.
          15-08-2017, 22:34 PM
        • Reply to Planning permission
          Always Problems
          Ask a Chartered Town Planner, and I thought that the breach had to be only 4 years...
          15-08-2017, 17:34 PM
        • S146 and rent arrears
          Lockwithoutstock
          Hi there,

          Bit of help;

          - Commercial Tenant has not paid rent on time or in full since February 2017
          - Then find out sub-letting and change of use is being applied/restructuring the building inside - both without permission
          - S146 served March 2017 to rectify by...
          12-07-2017, 19:38 PM
        • Reply to S146 and rent arrears
          Lockwithoutstock
          If I forfeit by peaceable entry, can I still apply for a repossession order? To secure having repossession.
          14-08-2017, 19:29 PM
        • Mixed use, Commercial law help needed!
          scooter08
          Advice needed, please.

          We recently took our l/l to court for non-protection of deposit. To cut a long story short, the court dismissed the case on the grounds that the tenancy was of mixed use class due to use also renting a shop on the side of the house (in the extension) therefore commercial...
          05-08-2017, 09:22 AM
        • Reply to Mixed use, Commercial law help needed!
          scooter08
          So sorry for the delay I have been away and had no internet at all.

          Thank you for the replies and sorry it's a bit vague. We rent a house and it has an extension on the side of the original house and within the extension is a shop that we also rent. When we first moved here I personally...
          12-08-2017, 12:33 PM
        • new ceiling
          cazuk12002
          Im opening cafe and I will be putting up fireboards over the original ceiling in the kitchen but I'm also doing the ceiling out the front where customers wil sit and eat ,
          im leaving the original ceiling there but putting in a new lower ceiling with just plasterboards that not fireboard, only...
          11-08-2017, 22:21 PM
        • Reply to new ceiling
          JK0
          Have a word with the building control officer at the local council.
          11-08-2017, 23:02 PM
        • Reply to Mixed use, Commercial law help needed!
          markhessel
          It is arguable that you have security of tenure and can thus claim a lease. The mixed use will be looked at as a fact and degree test. Section 23(1) of the LTA 1954 makes it clear the tenant’s occupation does not necessarily need to be exclusively for business purposes. It is sufficient if the occupation...
          11-08-2017, 13:39 PM
        Working...
        X